mouse monoclonal anti lamp2 antibody Search Results


97
Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank h4b4 anti human lamp 2 antibody
H4b4 Anti Human Lamp 2 Antibody, supplied by Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/h4b4 anti human lamp 2 antibody/product/Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
h4b4 anti human lamp 2 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Santa Cruz Biotechnology anti mac3 rat monoclonal antibody
Figure 2. Greater leaflet thickness and increased macrophage deposition in RBPKO/ mice fed an HCVD diet. Shown are Masson Trichrome staining (A to F) of aortic valves indicating collagen deposition (arrows) and <t>Mac3</t> immuno- staining (G to L) of aortic valves demon- strating macrophage infiltration (red; arrows indicate positive immunostaining) in WT mice fed the CC diet (A and G) or the HCVD diet (D and J), Notch1KO/ mice fed the CC diet (B and H) or the HCVD diet (E and K), and RBPKO/ mice fed the CC diet (C and I) or the HCVD diet (F and L). M and N, Mean data of cusp area (M) and percentage of positively stained sections for Mac3 (N) for all groups (n4 per group). One-way ANOVA and LSD post hoc analysis were used to compare differences between groups. Bars with different letters indi- cate significant differences (P0.05) vs all other groups (LSD post hoc analysis). Scale bar0.1 mm.
Anti Mac3 Rat Monoclonal Antibody, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti mac3 rat monoclonal antibody/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti mac3 rat monoclonal antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Thermo Fisher anti-lamp2 mouse monoclonal antibody
Figure 2. Greater leaflet thickness and increased macrophage deposition in RBPKO/ mice fed an HCVD diet. Shown are Masson Trichrome staining (A to F) of aortic valves indicating collagen deposition (arrows) and <t>Mac3</t> immuno- staining (G to L) of aortic valves demon- strating macrophage infiltration (red; arrows indicate positive immunostaining) in WT mice fed the CC diet (A and G) or the HCVD diet (D and J), Notch1KO/ mice fed the CC diet (B and H) or the HCVD diet (E and K), and RBPKO/ mice fed the CC diet (C and I) or the HCVD diet (F and L). M and N, Mean data of cusp area (M) and percentage of positively stained sections for Mac3 (N) for all groups (n4 per group). One-way ANOVA and LSD post hoc analysis were used to compare differences between groups. Bars with different letters indi- cate significant differences (P0.05) vs all other groups (LSD post hoc analysis). Scale bar0.1 mm.
Anti Lamp2 Mouse Monoclonal Antibody, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti-lamp2 mouse monoclonal antibody/product/Thermo Fisher
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti-lamp2 mouse monoclonal antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Cell Signaling Technology Inc rabbit anti lamp2
Figure 2. Greater leaflet thickness and increased macrophage deposition in RBPKO/ mice fed an HCVD diet. Shown are Masson Trichrome staining (A to F) of aortic valves indicating collagen deposition (arrows) and <t>Mac3</t> immuno- staining (G to L) of aortic valves demon- strating macrophage infiltration (red; arrows indicate positive immunostaining) in WT mice fed the CC diet (A and G) or the HCVD diet (D and J), Notch1KO/ mice fed the CC diet (B and H) or the HCVD diet (E and K), and RBPKO/ mice fed the CC diet (C and I) or the HCVD diet (F and L). M and N, Mean data of cusp area (M) and percentage of positively stained sections for Mac3 (N) for all groups (n4 per group). One-way ANOVA and LSD post hoc analysis were used to compare differences between groups. Bars with different letters indi- cate significant differences (P0.05) vs all other groups (LSD post hoc analysis). Scale bar0.1 mm.
Rabbit Anti Lamp2, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit anti lamp2/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit anti lamp2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Santa Cruz Biotechnology mouse anti-lamp2
Subcellular localization of Gag and the gRNA . Subcellular fractionations of 293T cells expressing wild-type HIV-1 (A, as in (21)) or NC(ΔZF1ZF2) (B) or ΔNC (C) were analyzed by OptiPrep gradient centrifugation. Cells were broken as described in materials and methods and the post-nuclear supernatant (PNS) was fractionated by Optiprep gradient. 20 μl of each fraction were loaded on SDS-PAGE, and Gag and <t>Lamp2</t> were analyzed by immunoblotting using anti-Cap24 and anti-Lamp2 antibodies. Each fraction of the gradient was tested for the presence of the gRNA by RT-PCR as described in materials and methods. The expected 132 bp DNA fragment was detected on 1% agarose gel. In addition to the gradient analyses, the immunofluorescence (IF) detections are shown, representing the cells stained with an anti-CAp24 (in green) for Gag (A) or mutated Gag (B and C), and the FISH treatment of the 293T cells expressing HIV-1 (A) or the NC Gag mutants (B and C) for the gRNA using the Gag-oligo-Cy3 probe (in red).
Mouse Anti Lamp2, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse anti-lamp2/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse anti-lamp2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Danaher Inc mouse anti lamp2 antibody
Endocytosed MT 1 is sorted through the endo-lysosomal pathway. A and B HeLa cells transfected with the GFP-MT 1 construct were treated with melatonin (1 mM) for indicated times. The colocalization of GFP-tagged MT 1 with endogenous EEA1 (A) and <t>LAMP2</t> (B) was inspected by immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy. Nucleus was stained with DAPI. Representative confocal sections are shown with magnified insets to illustrate colocalization. Graphs on the right show the quantification of fluorescence intensities for GFP-MT 1 (green) and EEA1 or LAMP2 (red). Scale bar = 10 μm. C HeLa cells transiently expressing GFP-MT 1 were pretreated with chloroquine (CQ) for 30 min prior to melatonin exposure for 0, 6, and 12 h. Samples were then analyzed by confocal microscopy. Micrographs show representative confocal sections, with magnified insets demonstrating the colocalization of GFP-MT 1 with LAMP2. Graphs on the right demonstrate quantification. Scale bar = 10 μm.
Mouse Anti Lamp2 Antibody, supplied by Danaher Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse anti lamp2 antibody/product/Danaher Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse anti lamp2 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Cell Signaling Technology Inc lamp2 rabbit mab
The immunoblot results of sEH levels in HepG2 cells treated for 24 h with 1a (250 nM) together with: (A) proteasome inhibitor MG132, or (B) lysosome inhibitor BafA1. Student’s t-test or Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test was performed depending on the normality. Asterisks represent the significant difference between MG132 in the presence and absence of 1a and/or BafA1 (*: P < 0.05, **: P < 0.01, ***: P < 0.001), the hashtags represent the significant difference between treatment vs 1a (#: P < 0.05, ##: P < 0.01). (C) Immunofluorescence results of the colocalization of sEH with <t>LAMP2.</t> Left panel: the representative images of immunofluorescence; Right panel: the quantification results of immunofluorescence. The area of colocalization was normalized to the number of cells in the corresponding images. Scale bar, 25 mm. Mean ± SEM are shown. The difference between DMSO, 1a’, and 1a were analyzed using one-way ANOVA Holm Sidak test. The difference between 1a, and 1a plus BafA1 was analyzed by Student’s t-test.
Lamp2 Rabbit Mab, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/lamp2 rabbit mab/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
lamp2 rabbit mab - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Danaher Inc fc lamp2 h4b4 abcam ab25631 mouse
The immunoblot results of sEH levels in HepG2 cells treated for 24 h with 1a (250 nM) together with: (A) proteasome inhibitor MG132, or (B) lysosome inhibitor BafA1. Student’s t-test or Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test was performed depending on the normality. Asterisks represent the significant difference between MG132 in the presence and absence of 1a and/or BafA1 (*: P < 0.05, **: P < 0.01, ***: P < 0.001), the hashtags represent the significant difference between treatment vs 1a (#: P < 0.05, ##: P < 0.01). (C) Immunofluorescence results of the colocalization of sEH with <t>LAMP2.</t> Left panel: the representative images of immunofluorescence; Right panel: the quantification results of immunofluorescence. The area of colocalization was normalized to the number of cells in the corresponding images. Scale bar, 25 mm. Mean ± SEM are shown. The difference between DMSO, 1a’, and 1a were analyzed using one-way ANOVA Holm Sidak test. The difference between 1a, and 1a plus BafA1 was analyzed by Student’s t-test.
Fc Lamp2 H4b4 Abcam Ab25631 Mouse, supplied by Danaher Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/fc lamp2 h4b4 abcam ab25631 mouse/product/Danaher Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fc lamp2 h4b4 abcam ab25631 mouse - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Becton Dickinson mouse anti-lamp2
The immunoblot results of sEH levels in HepG2 cells treated for 24 h with 1a (250 nM) together with: (A) proteasome inhibitor MG132, or (B) lysosome inhibitor BafA1. Student’s t-test or Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test was performed depending on the normality. Asterisks represent the significant difference between MG132 in the presence and absence of 1a and/or BafA1 (*: P < 0.05, **: P < 0.01, ***: P < 0.001), the hashtags represent the significant difference between treatment vs 1a (#: P < 0.05, ##: P < 0.01). (C) Immunofluorescence results of the colocalization of sEH with <t>LAMP2.</t> Left panel: the representative images of immunofluorescence; Right panel: the quantification results of immunofluorescence. The area of colocalization was normalized to the number of cells in the corresponding images. Scale bar, 25 mm. Mean ± SEM are shown. The difference between DMSO, 1a’, and 1a were analyzed using one-way ANOVA Holm Sidak test. The difference between 1a, and 1a plus BafA1 was analyzed by Student’s t-test.
Mouse Anti Lamp2, supplied by Becton Dickinson, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse anti-lamp2/product/Becton Dickinson
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse anti-lamp2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Cell Signaling Technology Inc lamp2
The immunoblot results of sEH levels in HepG2 cells treated for 24 h with 1a (250 nM) together with: (A) proteasome inhibitor MG132, or (B) lysosome inhibitor BafA1. Student’s t-test or Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test was performed depending on the normality. Asterisks represent the significant difference between MG132 in the presence and absence of 1a and/or BafA1 (*: P < 0.05, **: P < 0.01, ***: P < 0.001), the hashtags represent the significant difference between treatment vs 1a (#: P < 0.05, ##: P < 0.01). (C) Immunofluorescence results of the colocalization of sEH with <t>LAMP2.</t> Left panel: the representative images of immunofluorescence; Right panel: the quantification results of immunofluorescence. The area of colocalization was normalized to the number of cells in the corresponding images. Scale bar, 25 mm. Mean ± SEM are shown. The difference between DMSO, 1a’, and 1a were analyzed using one-way ANOVA Holm Sidak test. The difference between 1a, and 1a plus BafA1 was analyzed by Student’s t-test.
Lamp2, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/lamp2/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
lamp2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Proteintech lamp2a
The immunoblot results of sEH levels in HepG2 cells treated for 24 h with 1a (250 nM) together with: (A) proteasome inhibitor MG132, or (B) lysosome inhibitor BafA1. Student’s t-test or Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test was performed depending on the normality. Asterisks represent the significant difference between MG132 in the presence and absence of 1a and/or BafA1 (*: P < 0.05, **: P < 0.01, ***: P < 0.001), the hashtags represent the significant difference between treatment vs 1a (#: P < 0.05, ##: P < 0.01). (C) Immunofluorescence results of the colocalization of sEH with <t>LAMP2.</t> Left panel: the representative images of immunofluorescence; Right panel: the quantification results of immunofluorescence. The area of colocalization was normalized to the number of cells in the corresponding images. Scale bar, 25 mm. Mean ± SEM are shown. The difference between DMSO, 1a’, and 1a were analyzed using one-way ANOVA Holm Sidak test. The difference between 1a, and 1a plus BafA1 was analyzed by Student’s t-test.
Lamp2a, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/lamp2a/product/Proteintech
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
lamp2a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Proteintech mouse anti lamp2
The immunoblot results of sEH levels in HepG2 cells treated for 24 h with 1a (250 nM) together with: (A) proteasome inhibitor MG132, or (B) lysosome inhibitor BafA1. Student’s t-test or Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test was performed depending on the normality. Asterisks represent the significant difference between MG132 in the presence and absence of 1a and/or BafA1 (*: P < 0.05, **: P < 0.01, ***: P < 0.001), the hashtags represent the significant difference between treatment vs 1a (#: P < 0.05, ##: P < 0.01). (C) Immunofluorescence results of the colocalization of sEH with <t>LAMP2.</t> Left panel: the representative images of immunofluorescence; Right panel: the quantification results of immunofluorescence. The area of colocalization was normalized to the number of cells in the corresponding images. Scale bar, 25 mm. Mean ± SEM are shown. The difference between DMSO, 1a’, and 1a were analyzed using one-way ANOVA Holm Sidak test. The difference between 1a, and 1a plus BafA1 was analyzed by Student’s t-test.
Mouse Anti Lamp2, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse anti lamp2/product/Proteintech
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse anti lamp2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Figure 2. Greater leaflet thickness and increased macrophage deposition in RBPKO/ mice fed an HCVD diet. Shown are Masson Trichrome staining (A to F) of aortic valves indicating collagen deposition (arrows) and Mac3 immuno- staining (G to L) of aortic valves demon- strating macrophage infiltration (red; arrows indicate positive immunostaining) in WT mice fed the CC diet (A and G) or the HCVD diet (D and J), Notch1KO/ mice fed the CC diet (B and H) or the HCVD diet (E and K), and RBPKO/ mice fed the CC diet (C and I) or the HCVD diet (F and L). M and N, Mean data of cusp area (M) and percentage of positively stained sections for Mac3 (N) for all groups (n4 per group). One-way ANOVA and LSD post hoc analysis were used to compare differences between groups. Bars with different letters indi- cate significant differences (P0.05) vs all other groups (LSD post hoc analysis). Scale bar0.1 mm.

Journal: Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology

Article Title: Diet-induced aortic valve disease in mice haploinsufficient for the Notch pathway effector RBPJK/CSL.

doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.111.227561

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 2. Greater leaflet thickness and increased macrophage deposition in RBPKO/ mice fed an HCVD diet. Shown are Masson Trichrome staining (A to F) of aortic valves indicating collagen deposition (arrows) and Mac3 immuno- staining (G to L) of aortic valves demon- strating macrophage infiltration (red; arrows indicate positive immunostaining) in WT mice fed the CC diet (A and G) or the HCVD diet (D and J), Notch1KO/ mice fed the CC diet (B and H) or the HCVD diet (E and K), and RBPKO/ mice fed the CC diet (C and I) or the HCVD diet (F and L). M and N, Mean data of cusp area (M) and percentage of positively stained sections for Mac3 (N) for all groups (n4 per group). One-way ANOVA and LSD post hoc analysis were used to compare differences between groups. Bars with different letters indi- cate significant differences (P0.05) vs all other groups (LSD post hoc analysis). Scale bar0.1 mm.

Article Snippet: Inflammation was detected with anti-Mac3 rat monoclonal antibody (SC19991, Santa Cruz Technol, 1:200).

Techniques: Staining, Immunostaining

Subcellular localization of Gag and the gRNA . Subcellular fractionations of 293T cells expressing wild-type HIV-1 (A, as in (21)) or NC(ΔZF1ZF2) (B) or ΔNC (C) were analyzed by OptiPrep gradient centrifugation. Cells were broken as described in materials and methods and the post-nuclear supernatant (PNS) was fractionated by Optiprep gradient. 20 μl of each fraction were loaded on SDS-PAGE, and Gag and Lamp2 were analyzed by immunoblotting using anti-Cap24 and anti-Lamp2 antibodies. Each fraction of the gradient was tested for the presence of the gRNA by RT-PCR as described in materials and methods. The expected 132 bp DNA fragment was detected on 1% agarose gel. In addition to the gradient analyses, the immunofluorescence (IF) detections are shown, representing the cells stained with an anti-CAp24 (in green) for Gag (A) or mutated Gag (B and C), and the FISH treatment of the 293T cells expressing HIV-1 (A) or the NC Gag mutants (B and C) for the gRNA using the Gag-oligo-Cy3 probe (in red).

Journal: Retrovirology

Article Title: Intracellular HIV-1 Gag localization is impaired by mutations in the nucleocapsid zinc fingers

doi: 10.1186/1742-4690-4-54

Figure Lengend Snippet: Subcellular localization of Gag and the gRNA . Subcellular fractionations of 293T cells expressing wild-type HIV-1 (A, as in (21)) or NC(ΔZF1ZF2) (B) or ΔNC (C) were analyzed by OptiPrep gradient centrifugation. Cells were broken as described in materials and methods and the post-nuclear supernatant (PNS) was fractionated by Optiprep gradient. 20 μl of each fraction were loaded on SDS-PAGE, and Gag and Lamp2 were analyzed by immunoblotting using anti-Cap24 and anti-Lamp2 antibodies. Each fraction of the gradient was tested for the presence of the gRNA by RT-PCR as described in materials and methods. The expected 132 bp DNA fragment was detected on 1% agarose gel. In addition to the gradient analyses, the immunofluorescence (IF) detections are shown, representing the cells stained with an anti-CAp24 (in green) for Gag (A) or mutated Gag (B and C), and the FISH treatment of the 293T cells expressing HIV-1 (A) or the NC Gag mutants (B and C) for the gRNA using the Gag-oligo-Cy3 probe (in red).

Article Snippet: Viral proteins were separated on 10% SDS-PAGE and detected by immunoblotting with a mouse anti-CAp24 (P3D10G9B8, BioMérieux), and the cellular protein in the gradient was detected with the mouse anti-Lamp2 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.).

Techniques: Expressing, Gradient Centrifugation, SDS Page, Western Blot, Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction, Agarose Gel Electrophoresis, Immunofluorescence, Staining

Endocytosed MT 1 is sorted through the endo-lysosomal pathway. A and B HeLa cells transfected with the GFP-MT 1 construct were treated with melatonin (1 mM) for indicated times. The colocalization of GFP-tagged MT 1 with endogenous EEA1 (A) and LAMP2 (B) was inspected by immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy. Nucleus was stained with DAPI. Representative confocal sections are shown with magnified insets to illustrate colocalization. Graphs on the right show the quantification of fluorescence intensities for GFP-MT 1 (green) and EEA1 or LAMP2 (red). Scale bar = 10 μm. C HeLa cells transiently expressing GFP-MT 1 were pretreated with chloroquine (CQ) for 30 min prior to melatonin exposure for 0, 6, and 12 h. Samples were then analyzed by confocal microscopy. Micrographs show representative confocal sections, with magnified insets demonstrating the colocalization of GFP-MT 1 with LAMP2. Graphs on the right demonstrate quantification. Scale bar = 10 μm.

Journal: Journal of Advanced Research

Article Title: The ubiquitin-specific protease 8 antagonizes melatonin-induced endocytic degradation of MT 1 receptor to promote lung adenocarcinoma growth

doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2022.01.015

Figure Lengend Snippet: Endocytosed MT 1 is sorted through the endo-lysosomal pathway. A and B HeLa cells transfected with the GFP-MT 1 construct were treated with melatonin (1 mM) for indicated times. The colocalization of GFP-tagged MT 1 with endogenous EEA1 (A) and LAMP2 (B) was inspected by immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy. Nucleus was stained with DAPI. Representative confocal sections are shown with magnified insets to illustrate colocalization. Graphs on the right show the quantification of fluorescence intensities for GFP-MT 1 (green) and EEA1 or LAMP2 (red). Scale bar = 10 μm. C HeLa cells transiently expressing GFP-MT 1 were pretreated with chloroquine (CQ) for 30 min prior to melatonin exposure for 0, 6, and 12 h. Samples were then analyzed by confocal microscopy. Micrographs show representative confocal sections, with magnified insets demonstrating the colocalization of GFP-MT 1 with LAMP2. Graphs on the right demonstrate quantification. Scale bar = 10 μm.

Article Snippet: Mouse anti-LAMP2 antibody (ab25631, 1:50) was obtained from Abcam (Cambridge, UK).

Techniques: Transfection, Construct, Immunofluorescence, Confocal Microscopy, Staining, Fluorescence, Expressing

The immunoblot results of sEH levels in HepG2 cells treated for 24 h with 1a (250 nM) together with: (A) proteasome inhibitor MG132, or (B) lysosome inhibitor BafA1. Student’s t-test or Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test was performed depending on the normality. Asterisks represent the significant difference between MG132 in the presence and absence of 1a and/or BafA1 (*: P < 0.05, **: P < 0.01, ***: P < 0.001), the hashtags represent the significant difference between treatment vs 1a (#: P < 0.05, ##: P < 0.01). (C) Immunofluorescence results of the colocalization of sEH with LAMP2. Left panel: the representative images of immunofluorescence; Right panel: the quantification results of immunofluorescence. The area of colocalization was normalized to the number of cells in the corresponding images. Scale bar, 25 mm. Mean ± SEM are shown. The difference between DMSO, 1a’, and 1a were analyzed using one-way ANOVA Holm Sidak test. The difference between 1a, and 1a plus BafA1 was analyzed by Student’s t-test.

Journal: ACS chemical biology

Article Title: PROTAC-mediated selective degradation of cytosolic soluble epoxide hydrolase enhances ER-stress reduction

doi: 10.1021/acschembio.3c00017

Figure Lengend Snippet: The immunoblot results of sEH levels in HepG2 cells treated for 24 h with 1a (250 nM) together with: (A) proteasome inhibitor MG132, or (B) lysosome inhibitor BafA1. Student’s t-test or Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test was performed depending on the normality. Asterisks represent the significant difference between MG132 in the presence and absence of 1a and/or BafA1 (*: P < 0.05, **: P < 0.01, ***: P < 0.001), the hashtags represent the significant difference between treatment vs 1a (#: P < 0.05, ##: P < 0.01). (C) Immunofluorescence results of the colocalization of sEH with LAMP2. Left panel: the representative images of immunofluorescence; Right panel: the quantification results of immunofluorescence. The area of colocalization was normalized to the number of cells in the corresponding images. Scale bar, 25 mm. Mean ± SEM are shown. The difference between DMSO, 1a’, and 1a were analyzed using one-way ANOVA Holm Sidak test. The difference between 1a, and 1a plus BafA1 was analyzed by Student’s t-test.

Article Snippet: The following primary antibodies were used in this experiment: mouse monoclonal anti-sEH (sc-166961, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX), LAMP2 rabbit mAb (#49067, Cell signaling, Danvers, MA), β-tubulin antibody (#2146, Cell signaling, Danvers, MA), Catalase rabbit mAb (#12980, Cell signaling, Danvers, MA).

Techniques: Western Blot, MANN-WHITNEY, Immunofluorescence